<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Peek Inside: The client architecture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/11/11/a-peek-inside-the-client-architecture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/11/11/a-peek-inside-the-client-architecture/</link>
	<description>An adventure in managed self-service computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:50:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PowerPivot – Part 4: what’s inside? - Yaniv Mor</title>
		<link>http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/11/11/a-peek-inside-the-client-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>PowerPivot – Part 4: what’s inside? - Yaniv Mor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 04:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powerpivotgeek.com/?p=167#comment-345</guid>
		<description>[...] is an excellent post describing the client architecture of PowerPivot here. You can also read more about how Analysis Services server can hook into a PowerPivot model on BOL [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is an excellent post describing the client architecture of PowerPivot here. You can also read more about how Analysis Services server can hook into a PowerPivot model on BOL [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gemini &#8211; PoverPivot -VertiPaq &#171; Schindler IT Solution</title>
		<link>http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/11/11/a-peek-inside-the-client-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Gemini &#8211; PoverPivot -VertiPaq &#171; Schindler IT Solution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 18:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powerpivotgeek.com/?p=167#comment-117</guid>
		<description>[...] Eine Ausgezeichnete Beschreibung der Architektur findet sich hier [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eine Ausgezeichnete Beschreibung der Architektur findet sich hier [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Peek Inside #PowerPivot: The client architecture &#171; PowerPivot Twins!</title>
		<link>http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/11/11/a-peek-inside-the-client-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>A Peek Inside #PowerPivot: The client architecture &#171; PowerPivot Twins!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powerpivotgeek.com/?p=167#comment-9</guid>
		<description>[...] Read More&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read More&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention A Peek Inside: The client architecture « PowerPivotGeek -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/11/11/a-peek-inside-the-client-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention A Peek Inside: The client architecture « PowerPivotGeek -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powerpivotgeek.com/?p=167#comment-5</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by , Kasper de Jonge and Tom Freeman, Flex Monster Team. Flex Monster Team said: RT @Kjonge: Reading: A Peek Inside: The #powerpivot client architecture http://tinyurl.com/ycq6y7v Another loverly technical post! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by , Kasper de Jonge and Tom Freeman, Flex Monster Team. Flex Monster Team said: RT @Kjonge: Reading: A Peek Inside: The #powerpivot client architecture <a href="http://tinyurl.com/ycq6y7v" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/ycq6y7v</a> Another loverly technical post! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: powerpivotgeek</title>
		<link>http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/11/11/a-peek-inside-the-client-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>powerpivotgeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powerpivotgeek.com/?p=167#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Yup. I will fix it. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup. I will fix it. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siddharth Mehta</title>
		<link>http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/11/11/a-peek-inside-the-client-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Siddharth Mehta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powerpivotgeek.com/?p=167#comment-3</guid>
		<description>In the 3rd last bulleted point, it&#039;s mentiond that a Vertipa&lt;b&gt;w&lt;/b&gt; crash is an Excel crash. Is this a typo, or there is something that I need to educate myself. In my understanding you meant to type Vertipaq and you mistyped it to Vertipaw. Is this correct ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the 3rd last bulleted point, it&#8217;s mentiond that a Vertipa<b>w</b> crash is an Excel crash. Is this a typo, or there is something that I need to educate myself. In my understanding you meant to type Vertipaq and you mistyped it to Vertipaw. Is this correct ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
