<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why PowerPivot for SharePoint?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/12/02/why-powerpivot-for-sharepoint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/12/02/why-powerpivot-for-sharepoint/</link>
	<description>An adventure in managed self-service computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 06:54:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Juan Garcia</title>
		<link>http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/12/02/why-powerpivot-for-sharepoint/comment-page-1/#comment-542</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan Garcia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 10:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/12/02/why-powerpivot-for-sharepoint/#comment-542</guid>
		<description>My impression about PowerPivot (that might be wrong) is that this product is just a trap to increase Sahrepoint adoption in enterprises.
Aparently the product has no means of taking the data produced by the user to other software/tools.
It wold be trivial to provide that through any of the varios apis in .Net, so I presume it is an intentional miss.
Incredible as it may seem in the age of openness and user empowrment that we enjoy today, Microsoft resorts to practices of hard locking from the past. 
Knowledge users should know better!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My impression about PowerPivot (that might be wrong) is that this product is just a trap to increase Sahrepoint adoption in enterprises.<br />
Aparently the product has no means of taking the data produced by the user to other software/tools.<br />
It wold be trivial to provide that through any of the varios apis in .Net, so I presume it is an intentional miss.<br />
Incredible as it may seem in the age of openness and user empowrment that we enjoy today, Microsoft resorts to practices of hard locking from the past.<br />
Knowledge users should know better!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why PowerPivot for SharePoint? &#171; PowerPivot Twins!</title>
		<link>http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/12/02/why-powerpivot-for-sharepoint/comment-page-1/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Why PowerPivot for SharePoint? &#171; PowerPivot Twins!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 05:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/12/02/why-powerpivot-for-sharepoint/#comment-201</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more &#8230;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more &#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederick</title>
		<link>http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/12/02/why-powerpivot-for-sharepoint/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/12/02/why-powerpivot-for-sharepoint/#comment-99</guid>
		<description>Great article!
This question is frequently asked when I talk about PowerPivot. This article provides great arguments. Thanks,
Frederick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article!<br />
This question is frequently asked when I talk about PowerPivot. This article provides great arguments. Thanks,<br />
Frederick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some recent PowerPivot links &#171; PowerPivotPro</title>
		<link>http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/12/02/why-powerpivot-for-sharepoint/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Some recent PowerPivot links &#171; PowerPivotPro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 06:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/12/02/why-powerpivot-for-sharepoint/#comment-94</guid>
		<description>[...] &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/12/02/why-powerpivot-for-sharepoint/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; <a href="http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/12/02/why-powerpivot-for-sharepoint/" rel="nofollow">http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/12/02/why-powerpivot-for-sharepoint/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: powerpivotgeek</title>
		<link>http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/12/02/why-powerpivot-for-sharepoint/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>powerpivotgeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 05:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/12/02/why-powerpivot-for-sharepoint/#comment-93</guid>
		<description>Sorry. I don&#039;t know the differences between the various Office components, maybe someone else who is listening can answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry. I don&#8217;t know the differences between the various Office components, maybe someone else who is listening can answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Banfield</title>
		<link>http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/12/02/why-powerpivot-for-sharepoint/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Banfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/12/02/why-powerpivot-for-sharepoint/#comment-92</guid>
		<description>The flipside of the question is: Does it mean that you have to pay for PowerPivot if you&#039;re using the standard version of Office...or will it not work at all with the standard version?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The flipside of the question is: Does it mean that you have to pay for PowerPivot if you&#8217;re using the standard version of Office&#8230;or will it not work at all with the standard version?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: powerpivotgeek</title>
		<link>http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/12/02/why-powerpivot-for-sharepoint/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>powerpivotgeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/12/02/why-powerpivot-for-sharepoint/#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Yes. It was announced at SQL PASS a week ago or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. It was announced at SQL PASS a week ago or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vidas Matelis</title>
		<link>http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/12/02/why-powerpivot-for-sharepoint/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Vidas Matelis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powerpivotgeek.com/2009/12/02/why-powerpivot-for-sharepoint/#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Is that official that PowerPivot will be free with Office 2010 Professional license?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that official that PowerPivot will be free with Office 2010 Professional license?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
