<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Memory Considerations in PowerPivot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://powerpivotgeek.com/2010/02/03/memory-considerations-in-powerpivot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://powerpivotgeek.com/2010/02/03/memory-considerations-in-powerpivot/</link>
	<description>An adventure in managed self-service computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 01:58:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Memory Considerations in PowerPivot &#171; PowerPivot Twins!</title>
		<link>http://powerpivotgeek.com/2010/02/03/memory-considerations-in-powerpivot/comment-page-1/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>Memory Considerations in PowerPivot &#171; PowerPivot Twins!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 04:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powerpivotgeek.com/2010/02/03/memory-considerations-in-powerpivot/#comment-386</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco Russo</title>
		<link>http://powerpivotgeek.com/2010/02/03/memory-considerations-in-powerpivot/comment-page-1/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco Russo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 08:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powerpivotgeek.com/2010/02/03/memory-considerations-in-powerpivot/#comment-353</guid>
		<description>Thank you Dave.

Regarding memory considerations, I added a post about specific investigations on table denormalization. All feedbacks are welcome.

http://sqlblog.com/blogs/marco_russo/archive/2010/02/04/table-denormalization-study-in-powerpivot.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Dave.</p>
<p>Regarding memory considerations, I added a post about specific investigations on table denormalization. All feedbacks are welcome.</p>
<p><a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/marco_russo/archive/2010/02/04/table-denormalization-study-in-powerpivot.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://sqlblog.com/blogs/marco_russo/archive/2010/02/04/table-denormalization-study-in-powerpivot.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: powerpivotgeek</title>
		<link>http://powerpivotgeek.com/2010/02/03/memory-considerations-in-powerpivot/comment-page-1/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>powerpivotgeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 22:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powerpivotgeek.com/2010/02/03/memory-considerations-in-powerpivot/#comment-352</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately the limit is the storage mechanism in SharePoint; not the upload process itself. If you look at the schema for the SharePoint content database you will see that the actual *file* contents are stored as a sequence of blobs -- which the SP OM knows how to string together into the final results of the file when uploading/downloading. It uses 32-bit signed integers as offsets into the content -- which is where the 2GB limit comes from. It is an artifact of the file at rest.

_-_-_ Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately the limit is the storage mechanism in SharePoint; not the upload process itself. If you look at the schema for the SharePoint content database you will see that the actual *file* contents are stored as a sequence of blobs &#8212; which the SP OM knows how to string together into the final results of the file when uploading/downloading. It uses 32-bit signed integers as offsets into the content &#8212; which is where the 2GB limit comes from. It is an artifact of the file at rest.</p>
<p>_-_-_ Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco Russo</title>
		<link>http://powerpivotgeek.com/2010/02/03/memory-considerations-in-powerpivot/comment-page-1/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco Russo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 08:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://powerpivotgeek.com/2010/02/03/memory-considerations-in-powerpivot/#comment-347</guid>
		<description>Dave,

I&#039;d like to know if we can overcome this limit by:
1) Saving a &quot;small&quot; version of data in SharePoint, for example by using a view which filters only a part of data from the data source
2) Changing the view on SQL Server by removing the filter condition
3) Refreshing the PowerPivot data on SharePoint with a scheduled action - at that point, the workbook should be processed by SSAS engine, but will it be saved on SharePoint?

In other words, is the limit just for upload or for internal storage?

Marco</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to know if we can overcome this limit by:<br />
1) Saving a &#8220;small&#8221; version of data in SharePoint, for example by using a view which filters only a part of data from the data source<br />
2) Changing the view on SQL Server by removing the filter condition<br />
3) Refreshing the PowerPivot data on SharePoint with a scheduled action &#8211; at that point, the workbook should be processed by SSAS engine, but will it be saved on SharePoint?</p>
<p>In other words, is the limit just for upload or for internal storage?</p>
<p>Marco</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

